Completing a significant Squad Building Challenge (SBC) for the first time is often an exciting venture, especially when the player in question is a personal favorite. In this instance, SBC Zinedine Zidane, a football icon, has drawn mixed reviews from players who expected more from this high-profile addition to their squads. This discussion aims to explore the reasons behind the perceived underwhelming performance of SBC Zidane and how players have navigated the challenges associated with integrating him into their teams.
For the original poster, the disappointment stems from Zidane’s lack of effectiveness as a CAM (central attacking midfielder). The player notes that Zidane fails to position himself optimally, and both his passes and shots lack the desired impact. Additionally, experimenting with Zidane in a CM (central midfielder) role reveals weaknesses on the defensive end, leaving the player unsatisfied with the overall output. This sentiment raises questions about the viability of SBC Zidane and prompts the poster to express a preference for other icons like Eusebio.
A fellow player shares a similar sentiment, describing SBC Zidane as underwhelming after investing significant resources into acquiring him. The player details attempts to involve Zidane in the gameplay, dedicating five games to feed him the ball and unlock his magic. However, the anticipated impact did not materialize, and the player found Zidane’s contributions falling short of expectations. The approach shifted to treating Zidane like any other team member, allowing him to naturally find positions to influence the game. The player suggests that forcing plays through a specific individual can lead to a feeling of underwhelming performance, emphasizing the importance of letting the game flow organically.
The challenge highlighted by the original poster and echoed by the fellow player revolves around managing expectations and adapting gameplay to maximize the utility of SBC Zidane. While the desire to make a significant investment pay off by having Zidane involved in every play is understandable, it seems that a shift in perspective might be the key to unlocking the true potential of this iconic player.
The suggestion to stop forcing plays to Zidane and treat him as an integral part of the team aligns with the notion that organic and natural play often yields superior results. The fellow player’s experience of Zidane excelling when not being overly fixated upon reflects the delicate balance required in utilizing star players effectively. It becomes apparent that the perceived underwhelming nature of SBC Zidane may, to some extent, be influenced by unrealistic expectations and a lack of adaptability in integrating him into various playstyles.
Moreover, the challenge extends beyond tactical considerations to the psychological aspect of having invested substantial resources, both in terms of FC 24 coins and fodder, into acquiring SBC Zidane. The player acknowledges the difficulty in taking a step back and playing as they normally would, given the significant investment. The emotional attachment to the player, combined with the desire for a tangible return on investment, adds complexity to the evaluation of SBC Zidane’s performance.
In conclusion, the discourse surrounding SBC Zidane in EA FC 24 reflects the intricate dynamics involved in incorporating high-profile acquisitions into a team. The disappointment expressed by players may, in part, be rooted in the challenge of aligning expectations with the unpredictable nature of in-game performances. As the community explores different approaches and tactics to make SBC Zidane work effectively, it remains a testament to the evolving nature of player experiences in the dynamic world of FIFA gaming.
